The US Supreme Court on Tuesday sidestepped a growing controversy over who can give permission to access a computer, a debate that goes to the core of what constitutes hacking in this era of widespread use of the Internet and social media.
The justices turned away two cases over whether it is a violation of federal anti-hacking law for account holders to give a third party access to a computer system they do not own themselves. In doing so, they left in place a lower court ruling that went against a Cayman Islands company in a dispute with Facebook Inc, and another against a California-based executive recruiter.
The San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals last year ruled in both cases that only computer system owners may grant authorisation, and not account holders or employees with legitimate access credentials. — Reuters
- [LLODO] Utah teacher under investigation for tweet calling for killing of ‘Republican senators’
- [LLODO] California high court upholds ending adult trials for 14- and 15-year-old offenders
- [LLODO] Capitol police officer’s family says riot ‘trauma’ prompted suicide; seeks ‘line of duty’ designation
- [LLODO] NYC schools chancellor resigns, citing COVID-19 personal toll
- [LLODO] CPAC speaker Marsha Blackburn: What to know about Tennessee senator
- [LLODO] US firepower in Syria strike is revealed as officials brace for Iran’s next move
- [LLODO] Colorado bill would grant child sexual assault victims unlimited time to sue abusers
- [LLODO] Army’s first female infantry officer says lowering fitness standards for women would put ‘mission at risk’