• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
LLODO – News – Tech and Education

LLODO - News - Tech and Education

Breaking News, Latest News about education, Technoly

  • News Tech
  • World News
  • Education
  • Science
You are here: Home / Reviews / Symantec CEO says source code reviews pose unacceptable risk

Symantec CEO says source code reviews pose unacceptable risk

10/10/2017 by admin Leave a Comment

[ad_1]

U.S.-based cyber firm Symantec is no longer allowing governments to review the source code of its software because of fears the agreements would compromise the security of its products, Symantec Chief Executive Greg Clark said in an interview with Reuters.

Tech companies have been under increasing pressure to allow the Russian government to examine source code, the closely guarded inner workings of software, in exchange for approvals to sell products in Russia.

Symantec’s decision highlights a growing tension for U.S. technology companies that must weigh their role as protectors of U.S. cybersecurity as they pursue business with some of Washington’s adversaries, including Russia and China, according to security experts.

While Symantec once allowed the reviews, Clark said that he now sees the security threats as too great. At a time of increased nation-state hacking, Symantec concluded the risk of losing customer confidence by allowing reviews was not worth the business the company could win, he said.

The company’s about-face, which came in the beginning of 2016, was reported by Reuters in June. Clark’s interview is the first detailed explanation a Symantec executive has given about the policy change.

In an hour-long interview, Clark said the firm was still willing to sell its products in any country. But, he added, “that is a different thing than saying, ‘Okay, were going to let people crack it open and grind all the way through it and see how it all works’.”

While Symantec had seen no “smoking gun” that foreign source code reviews had led to a cyberattack, Clark said he believed the process posed an unacceptable risk to Symantec customers.

“These are secrets, or things necessary to defend (software),” Clark said of source code. “It’s best kept that way.”

Because Symantec’s market share was still relatively small in Russia, the decision was easier than for competitors heavily invested in the country, Clark said.

“We’re in a great place that says, ‘You know what, we dont see a lot of product over there’,” Clark said. “We dont have to say yes.”

Symantec’s decision has been praised by some western cyber security experts, who said the company bucked a growing trend in recent years that has seen other companies accede to demands to share source code.

“They took a stand and they put security over sales,” said Frank Cilluffo, director of the Center for Cyber and Homeland Security at George Washington University and a former senior homeland security official to former President George W. Bush. “Obviously source code could be used in ways that are inimical to our national interest,” Cilluffo said. “They took a principled stand, and thats the right decision and a courageous one.”

Reuters last week reported that Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) allowed a Russian defense agency to review the inner workings of cyber defense software known as ArcSight that is used by the Pentagon to guard its computer networks.

HPE said such reviews have taken place for years and are conducted by a Russian government-accredited testing company at an HPE research and development center outside of Russia. The software maker said it closely supervises the process and that no code is allowed to leave the premises, ensuring it does not compromise the safety of its products. A spokeswoman said no current HPE products have undergone Russian source code reviews.

ArcSight was sold to British tech company Micro Focus International Plc in a sale completed in September.

On Monday, Micro Focus said the reviews were a common industry practice. But the company said it would restrict future reviews of source code in its products by “high-risk” governments, and that any review would require chief executive approval.

[ad_2]

Source link

Related posts:

  1. [LLODO] Colorado murder trial witness is shot, killed; police offer reward for info
  2. [LLODO] Tennessee joint operation recovers 150 missing kids
  3. [LLODO] Mother accuses LA teacher’s union of ‘racial profiling’ after speaking out on closures
  4. [LLODO] Senate GOP blasts ‘blue state bailout’ in Biden’s $1.9T coronavirus bill
  5. [LLODO] North Carolina police force investigates after disturbing K-9 video emerges
  6. [LLODO]
  7. [LLODO] Why Andrew Cuomo is falling on all fronts
  8. [LLODO] NYC mother who abandoned four-year-old on the street released from jail
  9. [LLODO] Examples in state-mandated sex harass training strikingly similar to Cuomo allegations

Filed Under: Reviews

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured Posts

[LLODO] Colorado murder trial witness is shot, killed; police offer reward for info

03/04/2021

[LLODO] Tennessee joint operation recovers 150 missing kids

03/04/2021

[LLODO] Mother accuses LA teacher’s union of ‘racial profiling’ after speaking out on closures

03/04/2021

[LLODO] Senate GOP blasts ‘blue state bailout’ in Biden’s $1.9T coronavirus bill

03/04/2021

[LLODO] North Carolina police force investigates after disturbing K-9 video emerges

03/04/2021

Categories

  • Applications (750)
  • Business (6,322)
  • Education (2,606)
  • Health (4,182)
  • Iphone (2,005)
  • News Tech (11,826)
  • Reviews (6,041)
  • Science (1,546)
  • Technology (13,615)
  • World News (777)

Home - About Us - Privacy Policy - Contact Us - Site map
Copyright © 2021 · LLODO.COM - Internet Do - QA Do Eng