The two companies have been arguing over evidence since February, when Waymo’s suit was filed. Uber contends that Waymo has cast too wide a net and has been unsuccessful in its attempts to uncover damning evidence. Waymo has countered that Uber has not been forthcoming with crucial information.
Uber has repeatedly missed deadlines to hand over material, irking Judge Alsup and Waymo’s lawyers.
“Since the start of this case, Uber and its attorneys and agents have refused to produce key evidence, continued to harbor Waymo’s stolen files, and obstructed discovery at every turn,” Johnny Luu, a Waymo spokesman, said in a statement. “We welcome Alsup’s decision to allow Waymo to propose instructions to the jury regarding Uber’s misconduct and we look forward to trial.”
In court on Wednesday before the ruling, Mr. González blamed a mistake made by his law firm, Morrison & Foerster, for his failing to present a series of files downloaded by Mr. Levandowski during the discovery process. He said the firm intended to hand over the material.
A spokeswoman for Uber declined to comment on Friday.
Judge Alsup’s rebuke is another hit to Uber’s reputation. The privately held company, valued at $70 billion, is in the middle of a boardroom battle between its largest shareholders and is still searching for a new chief executive after the ouster of Travis Kalanick, Uber’s co-founder.
In early 2016, Mr. Levandowski left Google to form his own start-up, Otto, which focused on building a self-driving long-haul trucking business. Months later, Uber agreed to purchase Otto, and its team of autonomous vehicle engineers, for nearly $700 million.
Uber fired Mr. Levandowski in May after he missed a company deadline to hand over information relating to the court fight.
Waymo claims the creation of Otto was a setup created by Mr. Levandowski and Mr. Kalanick to pave the way for the eventual sale to Uber. Uber maintains Waymo’s claims are meritless.
Continue reading the main story