The time has come for Apple to pay for the infamous Error 53 that bricked iPhones and iPads taken to a third party for repairs.
The Federal Court of Australia announced Monday its order for Apple to pay AU$9 million (around US $6.8 million converted) for telling customers who encountered the error they weren’t entitled to a refund.
The error was first reported in. If you fixed a cracked screen or a failing Touch ID-enabled home button through a third party not licensed by Apple, “security checks” would render your iPhone or iPad unusable, showing only the message “Error 53”.
Apple explained the message as a security measure to protect the iPhone’s fingerprint sensor from exploitation. It released an iOS 9.2.1 update later that February to restore bricked devices, but reports showed it did not re-enable Touch ID andthey still lost photos, documents and apps.
In April 2017, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC)with Apple in the Federal Court of Australia. It said Apple violated customers’ rights under Australian Consumer Law to repairs for devices bricked by Error 53.
Then, in June 2017, the ACCC conducted anoperation involving 13 calls with Apple retailers in Australia, in which Apple representatives allegedly said Apple did not have responsibility to remedy faulty iPhones repaired by an unauthorised third party.
Apple has since admitted that from February 2015 to February 2016, its US website and Apple staff in Australian stores and on customer service phone calls said to 275 Australian customers affected by Error 53 it wasn’t responsible for a remedy.
But according to Australian Consumer Law, that’s not on.
“The Court declared the mere fact that an iPhone or iPad had been repaired by someone other than Apple did not, and could not, result in the consumer guarantees ceasing to apply, or the consumer’s right to a remedy being extinguished,” ACCC Commissioner Sarah Court said.
The ACCC had notified Apple about its investigation, spurring Apple to compensate 5,000 affected customers. That allegedly involved Apple exchanging faulty iPhones and iPads for refurbished replacements, not completely new devices. Apple has since committed to new replacements — if you request one.
“If people buy an iPhone or iPad from Apple and it suffers a major failure, they are entitled to a refund. If customers would prefer a replacement, they are entitled to a new device as opposed to refurbished, if one is available,” Court said.
Expect your Apple store workers to wear even bigger smiles: Apple says it will improve staff training, systems and procedures to ensure future compliance with Australian Consumer Law.
Apple was contacted for comment.
Tech Enabled: CNET chronicles tech’s role in providing new kinds of accessibility.
Blockchain Decoded: CNET looks at the tech powering bitcoin — and soon, too, a myriad of services that will change your life.